In a groundbreaking ruling, the Telangana High Court has reaffirmed the entitlement of daughters to claim a rightful share in their father’s self-acquired property, regardless of their financial status. Presided over by Justice M.G. Priyadarshini, the court’s verdict stemmed from an appeal filed by a brother against his sister following a partition suit favoring her. The central dispute revolved around a contested will purportedly drafted by their father, which aimed to deprive the sister of her claim due to her stable financial standing.
The trial court’s decision, rejecting the authenticity of the disputed will and ruling in favor of the sister, was upheld by the High Court. Emphasizing that financial status alone cannot negate a daughter’s entitlement, the court dismissed the appellant’s inconsistent arguments, including a challenge based on dowry and the introduction of a newly-discovered will.
The final judgment, dismissing the appeal, reinforces the daughter’s right to a fair share in her father’s property. Represented by Muralidhar Reddy Katram and M. Saleem respectively, the case underscores the judiciary’s dedication to equitable principles and gender-neutral legal interpretations in matters of inheritance. This landmark ruling sets a precedent for fair asset distribution among heirs, exemplifying the judiciary’s commitment to justice and equality.
Telangana High Court Affirms Daughter’s Inheritance Rights in Father’s Property
Significant Ruling by Justice M.G. Priyadarshini
In a significant ruling, the Telangana High Court has reaffirmed that a daughter’s financial status should not preclude her from claiming a rightful share in her father’s self-acquired property.
The verdict, delivered by Justice M.G. Priyadarshini, stems from an appeal filed by a brother against his sister following a partition suit that favored her. The contentious issue revolved around a purported will allegedly drafted by their father, which sought to deny the sister’s claim to his self-acquired property due to her sound financial standing.
Trial Court’s Verdict Upheld
The trial court, however, rejected the authenticity of the contested will and ruled in favor of the sister. In consonance with the lower court’s decision, the High Court emphasized:
Financial Status Shouldn’t Determine Rights
“Even assuming the alleged Will Deed to be genuine, it explicitly stated that the plaintiff’s good financial standing disqualifies her from claiming a share in her father’s self-acquired properties. However, a daughter’s financial status cannot be a sole determinant in denying her rightful claim.”
Inconsistent Arguments Dismissed
The appellant-brother presented inconsistent and untenable arguments during the appeal process. Initially, he argued that the sister received her due share in the form of dowry during her wedding, disputing her entitlement to partition ancestral properties. Additionally, he sought to introduce a newly-discovered will purportedly executed by their mother, urging its consideration and a retrial.
Conclusion: Upholding Equitable Principles
The High Court dismissed these contentions, emphasizing the lack of substantiating evidence regarding the alleged dowry provision. Moreover, it disregarded the purported will, emphasizing the mother’s assertion that both children are entitled to equal shares in their father’s self-acquired assets.
Final Verdict
In its final judgment, the High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the daughter’s entitlement to a rightful share in her father’s self-acquired property.
Read More
Case Details and Legal Representation
The case, AS 360 of 2020, saw Muralidhar Reddy Katram representing the appellant, while M. Saleem acted as counsel for the respondent.
The verdict underscores the judiciary’s commitment to uphold equitable principles and safeguard the rights of daughters in matters of inheritance and property rights.
This ruling serves as a precedent, reiterating the significance of gender-neutral legal interpretations and ensuring fair distribution of assets among heirs.
